Case Study in Competing Uses: The Columbia River Story
For thousands of years, Washington State's Columbia
River salmon runs were among the most prolific on
Earth. Unfortunately, dams and hydroelectric power
plants, commercial fishing operations, logging, irrigated
agriculture, and human population growth have altered
the river's flows. As a result of degrading salmon
habitat, some of the area's native salmon populations
are now listed as threatened or endangered under the
federal Endangered Species Act.
How can the Columbia River's resources be managed
to serve both people and fish? State officials and others
have faced difficult decisions as they struggle to satisfy
competing demands from the federal government, environmental
groups, cities and towns, farmers, and Native
American tribes who rely on the river's water. The river
continues to offer potential for economic development:
according to one calculation, withdrawing a million acre-feet of water (about 0.5 percent of the river's annual
flow) for irrigation would create 18,000 jobs and
annual revenues of approximately $850 million. However,
even a relatively small withdrawal of water could
have a negative effect on the area's threatened and endangered
salmon.
Ultimately, the state decided to focus its efforts on developing
new ways to store the river's water and improve
the efficiency of existing storage facilities. Under the
state's plan, one of every three gallons of water made
newly available through this process would be set aside
for protection of the salmon.
Elements of the Columbia River story echo throughout
watersheds across the country. Allocating water resources
to satisfy competing demands often requires effective
communication among stakeholders, thorough analysis
of the watershed's hydrological conditions, and creative
and innovative solutions. For more information on Columbia River water allocation, see the National Research Council report Managing the Columbia River: Instream Flows, Water Withdrawals, and Salmon Survival (2004).
|