Subject Areas
Resources
Special Sections
HGSE News  
 


No Child Left Behind?
A Faculty Response to President Bush's Education Bill

Harvard Graduate School of Education
July 1, 2002
 

Send this page to a friend
Subscribe to e-Updates

Commentaries in this Series
 Nothing New in Assessment Policy (Dan Koretz)

 A Serious Civil Rights Issue (Gary Orfield)

 Funding to Repair Rather Than Re-Create! (Milli Pierce)

 Good Intentions, Many Pitfalls (Paul Reville)

About the No Child Left Behind Act

On January 8, 2002, President Bush signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act, opening a new chapter of education history in the United States. Developed by a bipartisan team of legislators, the act mandates that states establish tough new academic standards, improve teacher quality, and create safe schools, among other measures. It also allocates a surprising $26.5 billion to public K-12 education—a 20 percent increase over last year.

Despite decades of attempts to foster educational equity, big barriers remain: the achievement gap between students of color and white students has widened since 1988; although violence has been on the decline, 37 percent of American students still report the presence of gangs in their schools; and debates still rage over school vouchers and charter schools, both of which divert funding from public school systems.

Can President Bush's bill address these and the many other complex dilemmas inside America's public schools? Will the plan benefit the students it seeks to serve? Will the act help or hinder student learning? These are the questions we posed, with one expert opinion from our faculty on an aspect of the bill featured here.

Milli Pierce is the director of the Principals' Center and a faculty member in the Learning and Teaching area at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Here, she offers her prognosis for the No Child Left Behind Act's perspective on school choice and charter schools.

Principals' Center director Milli Pierce

Once again "the sky is falling," and rather than solve the problems that exist in public education, the government wants to give parents a pass to get out. But where does that pass lead? In his new education bill, President Bush offers funding that encourages parents to take their children out of struggling public schools and place them in charter schools instead.

Unfortunately, charter schools have not been the universal, overwhelming success parents anticipated 10 years ago. On the contrary, inadequate funding has overtaxed and undermined charter school administrators and teachers; a sizable number have quit in frustration, further destabilizing the schools. It is not surprising, given that climate, that charter school students' test scores and achievement profiles have been largely lackluster. Few parents have found the panacea they were seeking.

It is time for President Bush to place the resources of the U.S. government behind efforts that improve needy public schools rather than denigrating them and draining their funds to create a series of new, similarly underfunded schools. This tactic avoids rather than addresses problems. The president of a conservative policy research foundation recently itemized for me all the failings of public schools. When I asked him why the resources that go into studying these problems are not matched by an investment in solving public school problems, he had no answer.

No wonder parents involved in failing schools want out. Every child deserves to be in a highly functioning school. This is possible without sending parents in search of an alternative that may not be better. If President Bush wants to provide economically disadvantaged students with high-performing schools, he should face the socioeconomic and political issues that enshroud the schoolyard before the children show up for their classes. Until that happens, he'll continue to leave many children behind.

For More Information
More information about Milli Pierce is available in the Faculty Profiles.

What do YOU think?



HGSE News, Harvard Graduate School of Education
© 2013 President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Classroom Practice | Cognitive Development | Technology & Learning | Urban Education & Equity | Educational Reform | Educational Administration | Subscribe | Advanced Search | Feedback | About the Site | Faculty Research | Faculty Profiles | News Office | Books & Special Features | In the News | Press Releases | On Campus | HGSE News Home | HGSE Home