Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political TheoryIn Against the State, Crispin Sartwell unleashes a quick and brutal rejection of the traditional arguments for state legitimacy. Sartwell considers the classics of Western political philosophy—Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Hegel, Hume, Bentham, Rawls, and Habermas, among others—and argues that their positions are not only wrong but also embarrassingly bad. He separates the traditional pro-state arguments into three classes: social contract theories, utilitarian justifications, and justicial views, all while attacking both general strategies and particular formulations. Sartwell argues that the state rests on nothing but deadly force and its accompanying coercion, and that no one is under any obligation to obey the law merely because it is the law. He concludes by articulating a positive vision of an anarchist future, based on the "individualism" of such figures as Emerson and Thoreau. Against the State provides a rigorous and provocative foil to the classic texts, and also serves as a concise statement of the anarchist challenge. |
Other editions - View all
Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory Crispin Sartwell No preview available - 2008 |
Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory Crispin Sartwell No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
achieve action actual anarchism anarchist appears argued argument assertion authority autonomy basic become believe body choice Civil claim classical coercion coercive conceptual condition consent constitute continuous contract theory course decision defined distribution duty effects emerges enforced entails example existing experience extent extreme fact follows force forms freedom give given Hegel Hobbes human idea identity imposed individual institutions interest justice keep kind least legitimacy legitimate less liberty limited live Locke matter means merely moral nature necessary never obey obligation observe one’s origin particular perhaps person philosophy political political philosophy position possible practical precisely principles question rational Rawls reason regard relations require responsibility rests result Rousseau rule sense simply situation social contract sort things tion true turn understand University utilitarian values violate voluntary