Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War: With a New Introductory EssaySince its publication twenty-five years ago, Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men has been recognized as a classic, an indispensable contribution to our understanding of the causes of the American Civil War. A key work in establishing political ideology as a major concern of modern American historians, it remains the only full-scale evaluation of the ideas of the early Republican party. Now with a new introduction, Eric Foner puts his argument into the context of contemporary scholarship, reassessing the concept of free labor in the light of the last twenty-five years of writing on such issues as work, gender, economic change, and political thought.A significant reevaluation of the causes of the Civil War, Foner's study looks beyond the North's opposition to slavery and its emphasis upon preserving the Union to determine the broader grounds of its willingness to undertake a war against the South in 1861. Its search is for those social concepts the North accepted as vital to its way of life, finding these concepts most clearly expressed in the ideology of the growing Republican party in the decade before the war's start. Through a careful analysis of the attitudes of leading factions in the party's formation (northern Whigs, former Democrats, and political abolitionists) Foner is able to show what each contributed to Republican ideology. He also shows how northern ideas of human rights--in particular a man's right to work where and how he wanted, and to accumulate property in his own name--and the goals of American society were implicit in that ideology. This was the ideology that permeated the North in the period directly before the Civil War, led to the election of Abraham Lincoln, and led, almost immediately, to the Civil War itself. At the heart of the controversy over the extension of slavery, he argues, is the issue of whether the northern or southern form of society would take root in the West, whose development would determine the nation's destiny.In his new introductory essay, Foner presents a greatly altered view of the subject. Only entrepreneurs and farmers were actually "free men" in the sense used in the ideology of the period. Actually, by the time the Civil War was initiated, half the workers in the North were wage-earners, not independent workers. And this did not account for women and blacks, who had little freedom in choosing what work they did. He goes onto show that even after the Civil War these guarantees for "free soil, free labor, free men" did not really apply for most Americans, and especially not for blacks.Demonstrating the profoundly successful fusion of value and interest within Republican ideology prior to the Civil War, Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men remains a classic of modern American historical writing. Eloquent and influential, it shows how this ideology provided the moral consensus which allowed the North, for the first time in history, to mobilize an entire society in modern warfare. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
1 | 11 |
II | 18 |
bility for paying their debts28 The Republicans distrust of | 23 |
2 | 40 |
affecting the whole American people and fixing for all | 56 |
in trying to prove that they were concerned only with | 61 |
IV | 66 |
teenth century If the calamity of civil war should | 190 |
Thurlow Weed we must not forget that the | 191 |
II | 193 |
of majority rule to coercion by a minority and | 224 |
7 | 226 |
There were several other reasons however why many | 230 |
II | 237 |
mann declared that because of its attempt to straddle or | 241 |
3 | 73 |
tension and perpetuation everywhere of human bondage | 87 |
III | 99 |
4 | 103 |
state has its New England within its border | 107 |
that of compromise32 They were as much moralists as politicians | 115 |
III | 124 |
in effect endorsed the principles of the KansasNebraska | 132 |
State harder and more difficult if it protracts their | 143 |
It may well have been true that as the | 144 |
5 | 149 |
II | 155 |
inclusion of too many former Democrats particularly such | 183 |
6 | 186 |
IV | 250 |
V | 257 |
8 | 261 |
the question of Negro rights was irrelevant to their partys | 265 |
III | 281 |
in other words that the colored population if | 292 |
IV | 295 |
9 | 301 |
HE REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY | 307 |
whole ideology which had come to view the institution | 313 |
Selected Bibliography | 319 |
First Blows of the Civil War New York | 324 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
36 Congress abolition abolitionists Adams Papers American anti-slavery Appendix April August Barnburners Blair Boston Buren Carey Carl Schurz Charles Francis Adams Charles Sumner Chase Papers Chicago Cincinnati Gazette Civil colonization Congressional Globe conservative Constitution Convention David December declared Democracy Doolittle economic election February free labor Free Soil Free Soil party Frémont fugitive slave law George Governor Hamlin Hannibal Hamlin Henry Wilson historians Historical Society History Horace Greeley HSPa ideology Illinois immigrants Indiana insisted Iowa issue James January John Joshua Giddings Journal Julian July June Know-Nothings leaders Liberty party Lincoln Lyman Trumbull March Massachusetts moderate nativist North northern November October Ohio opposed party's platform political publican Republican party Salmon secession Senate September Session Seward Slave Power slaveholders slavery Smith social South southern Speeches Springfield Republican Sumner Papers tariff territories Thurlow Weed tion Union University unpublished doctoral dissertation vols vote wage Washburn Wisconsin wrote York Tribune