Standard Measurement Uncertainty

In craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures, an emerging practice adopts the preoperative virtual planning that uses medical imaging (computed tomography), 3D thresholding (segmentation), 3D modeling (digital design), and additive manufacturing (3D printing) for the procurement of an end-use implant. The objective of this case study was to evaluate the cumulative spatial inaccuracies arising from each step of the process chain when various computed tomography protocols and thresholding values were independently changed. A custom-made quality assurance instrument (Phantom) was used to evaluate the medical imaging error. A sus domesticus (domestic pig) head was analyzed to determine the 3D thresholding error. The 3D modeling error was estimated from the computer-aided design software. Finally, the end-use implant was used to evaluate the additive manufacturing error. The results were verified using accurate measurement instruments and techniques. A worst-case cumulative error of 1.7 mm...

In craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures, an emerging practice adopts the preoperative virtual planning that uses medical imaging (computed tomography), 3D thresholding (segmentation), 3D modeling (digital design), and additive manufacturing (3D printing) for the procurement of an end-use implant. The objective of this case study was to evaluate the cumulative spatial inaccuracies arising from each step of the process chain when various computed tomography protocols and thresholding values were independently changed. A custom-made quality assurance instrument (Phantom) was used to evaluate the medical imaging error. A sus domesticus (domestic pig) head was analyzed to determine the 3D thresholding error. The 3D modeling error was estimated from the computer-aided design software. Finally, the end-use implant was used to evaluate the additive manufacturing error. The results were verified using accurate measurement instruments and techniques. A worst-case cumulative error of 1.7 mm...

The paper presents the results of accuracy testing of three-dimensional optical scanner that is used in the process of computer integrated fixed dental construction manufacturing in dental medicine. The main purpose of 3d scanning is to acquire information about real object's geometry and transform the collected data into digital form. This enables changes to the digital model inside computer software and considerably shortens the process of construction modelling. Due to the field of use, the scanner user interface is simple and user friendly. Also, the required accuracy of scanning is not high, due to the possibilities of manually adapting the construction at the implantation. The main purpose of the experiment was to establish the achievable accuracy range of dental scanner for usage in quality control in mechanical engineering in general. Paper presents the experiment and results together with explanation of possible causes of deviations. Also, problem and possible solutions that could influence the scanner's accuracy are discussed.

In this work, the additive manufacturing process selective laser melting is analysed with the aim of realising a complex piece for aerospace applications. In particular, the effect of the manufacturing process and of the following thermal treatments on the dimensions of the workpiece is evaluated. The study is based on a hybrid approach including a simulation of the whole manufacturing process by advanced software packages and the dimensional measurements of the realised pieces taken by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The integrated use of simulation and measurements is carried out with the aim of validating the simulation results and of identifying the operational limits of both approaches; this analysis is based on metrological evaluation of the results of both the simulation and the tests, taking into account the uncertainty of the data. In addition, the main causes of uncertainty for the simulation activity and the experimental data have been identified, and the effects of...

Featured Application: Accuracy of additively manufactured implants for clinical surgery. Abstract: In craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures, an emerging practice adopts the preoperative virtual planning that uses medical imaging (computed tomography), 3D thresholding (segmentation), 3D modeling (digital design), and additive manufacturing (3D printing) for the procurement of an end-use implant. The objective of this case study was to evaluate the cumulative spatial inaccuracies arising from each step of the process chain when various computed tomography protocols and thresholding values were independently changed. A custom-made quality assurance instrument (Phantom) was used to evaluate the medical imaging error. A sus domesticus (domestic pig) head was analyzed to determine the 3D thresholding error. The 3D modeling error was estimated from the computer-aided design software. Finally, the end-use implant was used to evaluate the additive manufacturing error. The results were veri...

Featured Application: Accuracy of additively manufactured implants for clinical surgery. Abstract: In craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures, an emerging practice adopts the preoperative virtual planning that uses medical imaging (computed tomography), 3D thresholding (segmentation), 3D modeling (digital design), and additive manufacturing (3D printing) for the procurement of an end-use implant. The objective of this case study was to evaluate the cumulative spatial inaccuracies arising from each step of the process chain when various computed tomography protocols and thresholding values were independently changed. A custom-made quality assurance instrument (Phantom) was used to evaluate the medical imaging error. A sus domesticus (domestic pig) head was analyzed to determine the 3D thresholding error. The 3D modeling error was estimated from the computer-aided design software. Finally, the end-use implant was used to evaluate the additive manufacturing error. The results were verified using accurate measurement instruments and techniques. A worst-case cumulative error of 1.7 mm (3.0%) was estimated for one boundary condition and 2.3 mm (4.1%) for two boundary conditions considering the maximum length (56.9 mm) of the end-use implant. Uncertainty from the clinical imaging to the end-use implant was 0.8 mm (1.4%). This study helps practitioners establish and corroborate surgical practices that are within the bounds of an appropriate accuracy for clinical treatment and restoration.

We evaluate the type B standard uncertainty when there is not enough measurement data to calculate the type A standard uncertainty. A value and degrees of freedom of the type B standard uncertainty may often be evaluated by the simple procedure given here. The degrees of freedom enables reliable calculation of an interval and level of confidence, even in a case of small sample size. Because of the essential importance of the interval and level of confidence, above mentioned evaluations, or equivalent, should be put in the same category with other evaluations related to the standard uncertainty.