Add model matrix as output in rule to allow custom downstream rules to see it#30
Merged
sreichl merged 1 commit intoepigen:mainfrom Jan 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…e contrasts to use it
Collaborator
|
Great, thanks! Yes I do exactly the same and would have needed this anyway! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
– Downstream of the dea module I have a custom rule that calculates contrasts
– Based on the code you provide in the README this loads the design matrix
– This is saved implicitly by the rule dea
– To connect it to my downstream rule, I made that explicit.
– I think this change would profit many users of MrBiomics that will use contrasts
– I tested these changes and they worked as expected