'Set of pearls' mathematics / physics help

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter lostsoul13
  • Start date Start date
lostsoul13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I read on wiki that some theory’s/equations have set of pearl necklaces and bracelets within their equations- but can’t find it no more - can you help with the theory ?
I was browsing wiki’s physics theory’s couple years ago and came across a few equations that stated they have pearl necklaces and bracelets within they fields of equations- I’ve tried researching - I mean I went down the garden path of all sorts of theory’s and equations… they inherent these sets as a byproduct of their equations can any one point me in a direction of what theory’s equations possess the pearl bracelets and necklace??

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

Can you be more specific about how they have pearl necklaces and bracelets in the equations?
https://josmfs.net/2021/07/24/the-pearl-necklace-problem/
They inherited these sets as apart of their theory field - from what I understood it was like spinners groups and these were some sort of classes on their own - there was a few theory’s that inherited either a bracelet or necklace or something both.. but it had its own equation how they would inherit these pearls.
 
Baluncore said:
Can you be more specific about how they have pearl necklaces and bracelets in the equations?
https://josmfs.net/2021/07/24/the-pearl-necklace-problem/
If this is the problem referred to in this thread, it seems pretty straightforward, although I haven't actually set anything down on paper. My approach would be to add two finite sums so that their combined sum is $65,000, and solve the resulting equation.
lostsoul13 said:
They inherited these sets as apart of their theory field - from what I understood it was like spinners groups and these were some sort of classes on their own - there was a few theory’s that inherited either a bracelet or necklace or something both.. but it had its own equation how they would inherit these pearls.
@lostsoul13, there are such things as spinors in physics (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinor) but what you wrote here otherwise makes no sense.

BTW, the plural of theory is theories, not theory's.
 
Last edited:
Mark44 said:
BTW, the plural of theory is theories, not theory's.
How about theorems? A theory is so vague, but a theorem seems more mathematical.
 
jackjack2025 said:
A theory is so vague, but a theorem seems more mathematical.
Are you aware of group theory, the subset of modern algebra that is concerned with groups?
 
Mark44 said:
Are you aware of group theory, the subset of modern algebra that is concerned with groups?
yes
 
jackjack2025 said:
How about theorems? A theory is so vague, but a theorem seems more mathematical.
Two different animals.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top