Bose-Einstein statistics and the Photon

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
Number and annihilation/creation formalism for bosons (under commutation) and for fermions (under anti-commutation) is derived for objects in the orbit ##X^+_m##. However, photons are not represented by this orbit of the Poincare group. As a result, how can the resulting formalism be utilized for photons? (See for example, Folland, Quantum Field Theory: A Tourist Guide for Mathematicians, https://bookstore.ams.org/view?ProductCode=SURV/149)
The Hilbert space for the derivation is:
##\mathcal{H}=L^2(X_m^+,\lambda)##
where λ denotes the invariant measure over ##X_m^+##.

This space does not include photons because they are not represented by the orbit ##X_m^{+}##.

Thus, it would seem that the resulting derivation would not apply to photons which are bosons.
 
Last edited:
Figure 22 - Why does Feynman say that the different lengths A to M are so minor that he is going to ignore them but the time difference differ by the same amount and they are not ignored. Was it just the same for the drawing representation of the arrows? Figure 24c - Why are different paths A to M vectors added to each other when each path are done independently/in parallel and not sequentially/in series? What exactly does the sum of all the A to M vectors represent? What does "This also...
Everytime that I deal with Bogoliubov transformations I get some sign wrong or a missing assumption. Let's take the case for fermions $$c_{\mathbf p \sigma}=u_{\mathbf p \sigma} b_{\mathbf p \sigma} +v_{\mathbf p \sigma} b^\dagger_{-\mathbf p \bar{\sigma}}$$ where ##\sigma## is the spin variable, ##\bar{\sigma}## the opposite one and ##b## are the Bogoliubov operators. Per commutation relations $$|u_{\mathbf p \sigma}|^2+|v_{\mathbf p \sigma}|^2=1.$$ Now my deal is how to derive more...
I understand how to regularize the integrals in a electron vertex function using Pauli–Villars regularization, however in books like Schwartz this is seen as having introduced some "ghosts fields". How do I get that idea? When writing in that vertex function $$\frac{1}{k^2-m^2}\to\frac{1}{k^2-m^2}-\frac{1}{k^2-M^2}$$ for some large ghost mass ##M##. How do I understand the inclusion of these particles? Is it that the electron is taken as a ghost particle during renormalization? or is the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
87
Views
7K
Replies
96
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top