Kennedy Seat Appointment Is Imminent

Paul G. Kirk

Update: It’s official. See related article.

Stay tuned. At 11 this Thursday morning, Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts is expected to appoint Paul G. Kirk Jr., a fixture in state and national Democratic politics, to be the interim senator filling the seat of the late Edward M. Kennedy.

Mr. Kirk, 71, the favored replacement within the Kennedy family as well as a former aide to the senator and a former chairman of the Democratic party, would give Senate Democrats their coveted 60-vote majority. His background and close relationship to the Kennedys would make his transition to the Senate rather seamless, as both Abby Goodnough and Carl Hulse note in their article Thursday.

But that number remains precarious, with Senator Robert C. Byrd, the elder statesman from West Virginia, hospitalized again this week. While Mr. Byrd’s aides have played down this latest hospitalization as precautionary after the 91-year-old senator fell, he has been in frail health for a while and has only shown up in the Senate for key votes, like the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

Filling Mr. Kennedy’s seat has been a high priority for Democratic leaders, whose top priority this fall is the passage of health care legislation — one of the biggest goals of the late senator’s life.

The interim appointment would be in effect until a special election in a few months is held for the seat.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

i haven’t heard anyone explain why health insurance is not regulated at the national level since Congress can do that under Commerce Clause. Does anyone know why? I’m no partisan.

With Senator Byrd’s health in a precarious position, and meaning no disrespect, below is the WV Constitution provision for filling a vacant U.S. Senate seat. For the record, his current term is not up until January, 2013.

“United States Senate

Vacancies in the U. S. Senate are filled by appointment of the Governor, and the appointed Senator serves until the next election that is more than two years and six months away from the date of the vacancy. In other words, if a vacancy occurs after the specific day in May of an election year which marks the 2-year 6-month cutoff, the appointment would not be filled at the election held that fall, but the appointee would serve until the certification of the election two years following. The law does not provide for nominations from any committee.”

Look for the GOP “squealing” to begin a nanosecond after Deval Patrick declares an “emergency” and Paul Kirk’s on his way to Logan!

Great news. Another vote to get health care passed.

Well, gosh! It’s nice to know that the Massachusetts governor has received the blessing of the Kennedy family to pick someone from the recently departed’s staff.

This whole story stinks to high heaven – changing the law five years ago specifically to limit a Republican governor’s authority, only to tweak it again to increase a Democratic governor’s power. And then this business of feeling it necessary to seek the approval of the all-powerful Kennedy family for the replacement? What a total crock!

I’m sooooo glad we fought a war a couple hundred years ago to rid ourselves of tyranny, corruption, and dynastic families, only to adopt corrupt tyrants and dynastic families to take their places. And we wonder why the Iranian dictator speaks ill of our system of government before the U.N.!

Unmitigated disaster!

You’re right Ed, something stinks. It’s the ever dimishinging number of the GOP who keep up with “no, no, no”. Can’t help but wonder if you’d be so vehement if it were a Republican Governor replacing a Republican Senator?

Paul Kirk is a fine choice for the interim appointment in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and it is up to the voters there to measure any displeasure with Governor Patrick by voting for someone else.

Gee, I seem to recall Democrats screaming the last 8 years about the problem of democracy and majority rule. I guess this just confirms that Democrats really are not about principles but just about what the majority can ram down the throats of the entirety. Same with health care reform. Since all the Democrats can argue is majority rules or filibuster proof Senate rules, and cannot argue principles and right and wrong, the Democrats cannot convince anyone that health care reform is the right thing to do. Democrats cannot argue health care reform is the moral thing to do. All Democrats can argue is, as with the kennedy seat, the majority is well-entitled to ram it down the throats of the electorate, and principles of right and wrong so what.

Up here in Kennedychusetts this appointment is being received for precisely what it is: Partisan politics immersed in two wek old fish–it stinks to high heaven. Now that the Princes Kennedy and the mourning Princess Vicky have ordained the ascension of Captain Kirk to the Senate, Mass. voters are expected to praise him [and the Lords and Ladies of the Royal Kennedy family] for their wise, astute and beneficent ruling in place of obeying the laws set forth. Can’t let those silly legal rulings, laws, etc. get in the way when a Kennedy [dead or alive] is involved, can we?

Paul Kirk seems like a perfect choice to fill Mr. Kennedy’s seat. It is good Deval Patrick found someone suitable. A vacancy in a liberal Senate seat is never a good thing, especially with great political battles to wage still. Health care, environmental regulations, a host of social policies, and the economy all need to be reformed; and these changes can only be implemented efficiently with a large Democratic majority. The Republicans only know how to obstruct.

To Joe M (#5)

“Can’t help but wonder if you’d be so vehement if it were a Republican Governor replacing a Republican Senator?”

I am already on the record elsewhere, for saying that very scenario – a GOP legislature changing the law every couple of years to cut off a Democratic governor’s power only to empower the next GOP governor – as just as bad as this. The difference is that the GOP hasn’t actually done anything like this, and the Democrats in Massachusetts have.

Being a middle-of-the-road independent, I feel free to call them like I see them without fear of backlash from “my” party, while expecting a little form both parties. Bush made plenty of mistakes. The GOP has made plenty, too. Since your favorite party is currently in near-total power, it your pals in the DNC that get the majority of my scorn.

Mr. Kirk is the executor of Kennedy’s will, so it is natural , is it not, for the executor to manage Mr. Kennedy’s assets, including his ownership of the senate seat from Taxachusetts. Now the Kennedy estate has a few months to auction off this asset to see how much it wil bring. There is none of the feigned protests, which accompanied the eBay auctioning of Obama’s Illinois Senate seat. If no one offers enough fot the Kennedy throne, this also provides some time for the family to sort out how they will share the seat. Let’s see, this year this one goes to the senate, while that one has the use of the Palm Beach estate, and the other one can summer at Hyannisport. It is all quite civilized, really. If any of you peons can’t fathom all of this, perhaps you should renounce your Ivy league degree.

I hope a health care bill gets passed and I hope Deval Patrick and these MA legislators get ousted at the next election.