Statue of Liberty’s Crown Will Reopen July 4

Statue of Liberty's crownTodd Heisler/The New York Times Closed after 9/11, the Statue of Liberty’s crown will reopen on July 4.

Updated, 12:29 p.m. | The Statue of Liberty‘s crown, which was closed after the 9/11 attacks, will reopen to the public on July 4, the White House announced on Friday morning. The decision reversed the policy of the Bush administration.

Under President George W. Bush, the Interior Department, which includes the National Park Service, had insisted that visitors could not be permitted because the crown — reachable only by a very narrow, 12-story spiral staircase with a low guardrail — did not meet modern fire, building and safety codes.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar formally announced the decision at a news conference at 9 a.m. on Ellis Island. “On July 4, we are giving America a special gift,” Mr. Salazar said.

No more than 10 people will be allowed in the crown at a time, he said, and officials anticipate that will allow for 30 visitors an hour. He estimated that 50,000 people would be able to visit the crown in the first year and that the number would be increased later to 100,000 a year. A spokeswoman for Mr. Salazar said that the method for distributing tickets had yet to be determined but that the secretary was committed to making sure the process was fair and equitable. Early reports that a lottery system would be used were incorrect, she said.

The decision to reopen the crown is a significant victory for Representative Anthony D. Weiner, a Queens Democrat who has been one of the most vocal proponents of giving the public access to the crown.

The statue’s torch was closed in 1916 after being damaged by a saboteur’s bomb. The entire statue, including the crown, was closed after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The base of the statue reopened to the public on Aug. 3, 2004, after a $20 million effort to improve fire safety, security and evacuation routes. (The park service was criticized for its delays in reopening the base and for relying heavily on a private group, the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, to raise money for the project.) But federal officials said the crown could not be safely reopened because of the difficulty of getting people out in an emergency.

In a five-page letter [pdf] in August 2006, Fran P. Mainella, the director of the park service at the time, told Mr. Weiner that federal experts had been concerned, as early as 2000, that allowing the public in the crown was unsafe because of the lack of exit options. Ms. Mainella told Mr. Weiner that the park service was committed to increasing the number of visitors and to broadening access to an interpretive program about the statue.

Nonetheless, Mr. Weiner continued to press his case, calling for hearings and using the appropriations process to try to cajole the park service to take up the matter.

At a Congressional hearing in September 2007, Daniel N. Wenk, a deputy director of the park service, said the statue’s creator, Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi, “never intended or designed the Statue of Liberty as something to enter or climb.” Only after it opened in 1886 did the War Department — the predecessor of the Defense Department — begin letting “curiosity seekers” inside, Mr. Wenk said.

When the park service began administering the statue in 1933, Mr. Wenk said, there were fewer than 200,000 visitors a year. In 2006, more than 2.5 million people visited Liberty Island.

The spiral staircase leading to the crown was intended for periodic use by maintenance workers, Mr. Wenk said, “not for heavy, daily use” by the public.

Even for people in peak physical condition, climbing the 12-story staircase is a challenge, he said, adding: “A key danger is that once a visitor begins the climb, turning back before reaching the crown is nearly impossible. Each person is blocked by hundreds of people in front and behind.”

Mr. Wenk even invoked several catastrophic fires in the past — at the Triangle shirtwaist factory in New York in 1911, the Cocoanut Grove nightclub in Boston in 1942, and the Station nightclub in West Warwick, R.I., in 2003 — to argue that the federal government must put public safety first.

Short of building a 22-story tower with a new staircase next to the statue “and cutting through the Statue of Liberty’s copper skin to build a bridge” to the tower, there is no way to provide a safe exit from the statue’s interior consistent with fire and building codes, Mr. Wenk said at the hearing. He called such a tower an “unacceptable option.”

Despite those concerns, in June 2008, the park service put out requests for bids to assess the safety concerns and to determine what alterations and restrictions, if any, would make the crown safe for visitors.

In January of this year, Mr. Salazar climbed the 146 steps to the crown himself, joined by Mr. Weiner, Representative Albio Sires of New Jersey and Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey. When Mr. Salazar came down, he said of the experience: “One word: Awesome.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

This is long overdue.

The torch may have been closed in 1916, but two of my uncles, both soldiers in uniform back from Europe, and on their way to the presumed invasion of Japan in 1945, took me up it. I seem to remember a locked door that was opened for them. The steps were more like a ladder than the spiral steps leading to the crown. Even at 8, I remember how tiny the space was, and how scary and awesome.

Re-opening the crown is a good idea, but the safety concerns are legitimate. The Park Service should limit access to the extent necessary to carry out an evacuation to the base in eg 120-150 seconds.

This is long overdue, but it is not the change I was hoping for. I want to see many of the desperate conditions in the inner-cities and in the poor areas of our country addressed directly and upfront, and not be made to wait on the trickle down effect of any stimulus. This is real change in the lives of our citzens. Give these people hope for the furure, so they can move to be productive individuals and better prepare their children to join the mainstream of this society. How many people orther than tourists visit the Statue of Liberty? I have live in NYC for over 15 years and visited the “statue” only once, and have no plans to go back. I want to see some real change in the lives of real people.

Sweet!

Hope I can get an eye-level look at Air Force One next time it flies by.

Climbing to the crown and learning about the statue are great memories from childhood. It’s terrific that this opportunity will be available to all once again.

This is a mistake–although the intentions may seem good, who will be blamed when people die or are injured in a fire or when someone loses it and tries to come down precipitously? I’ve been up there and it’s not safe. I disaster in the making.

Overdue and an appropriate occasion to examine some other failed policies of The Nanny State.

The whole statue should be closed. There is no purpose whatsoever in allowing people to climb up into it. None. Close the Island and cut the NPS budget. The statute can be viewed from battery park and passing ferries.

Last time I was in the crown was about 42 or 43 years ago, when I was a young teenager. It was the middle of July, the thermometer inside said 114 F (it wasn’t close to that outside) and the walk up was interminable. It was worth every hot, sweaty minute.

Every risk that can be avoided must be avoided. This is the American way, and it cheats us out of life. Now that I think of it, it’s rather ironic that the struggle between the pursuit of complete safety and full free, living is happened inside of Lady Liberty. And freedom won! Go Bama, go Bama…

Common Sense, Philadelphia May 8, 2009 · 8:33 am

Nice.

If this opens up as scheduled, I’ll take my child up the statue for the first time in his life to connect him better with the legacy of liberty that he inherits …

This is a wonderful decision and I assume it was made by President Obama himself. Safety concerns cannot dominate every dialogue on public access to significant monuments. Like many other aspects of life, the decision to climb or not climb the statue should be undertaken with a conscious understanding of the potential risk involved. Nothing in life is risk free, and those who are unable to tolerate risk should not climb the statue. Nor should they drive a car.

Sure, close it, no purpose in having it open.
you’re right – as a matter of fact, we should just dismantle it and move it to the smithsonian.

It’s sad what this country is turning into – I think reopening the entire statue would at least help remind people of what they once were, and might – just might – inspire some to try to attain that once again…

Europe is full of monuments with narrow, even harrowing staircases offering the only access to their breathtaking vantagepoints. Anyone who’s scaled the Duomo in Florence or Saint Paul’s or the Great Fire Monument in London, just to name a few, will know what I mean. Like the Statue of Liberty’s stairway, once you start those climbs you must finish in order to reach the safe way down.

If those facilities can be kept open to the public in the EU, where safety regulations tend to be far stricter than they are here, then surely we can manage to reopen the Statue’s crown. I’d like to think (though I’m probably wrong, unfortunately) that visitors will be honest with themselves as to whether they’re up to the climb before they embark.

My memories of climbing to the crown – and I’m pretty sure the torch – go back 50 years. We went on school trips that were very well monitored, but it was a hot, exhausting and scary climb. The view was extraordinary and I’ve often wanted to see it again.

The concept of reopening the crown is nostalgic and wonderful, but what is the reality today? How will this be made safe and if we do have a terrorist up there, it will be the ultimate ‘statement’ of destroying the American Dream.

I have little confidence in the administration’s follow through here. They will delegate and then prevaricate if trouble follows. I think I’ll stick with my memories and tell my family to ignore Obama’s newest gift.

This is long overdue. Posted warnings at the base for those out of shape, heart conditoins, etc. like every ride at any amusement park should be sufficient. Typical of the previous administration, there was an over reaction not based on science or facts.

I too remember going to the statue on many a school field trip when I was younger and the greatest part was going up into the crown. Until now I have resisted taking my own kids due to the limited access. While my older daughter has visited with her school in the past, it was not the same. Now I can share the full experience with both of them this summer.

Having been up 3 times in my life, I say hurrah! Yes the staircase is narrow. Yes it is a rough climb. Go up at your own risk. Know your own limits. If you panic or are to out of shape, don’t blame the government for allowing you to go up. Blame yourself for not knowing what you are and are not capable of. Besides, if I remember correctly, there are a few “seats” that jut out along the way to let people pass. This country needs to grow up and start being personally responsible and the Statue of Liberty is no better place to start.

Jason N., Kalamazoo, MI May 8, 2009 · 8:47 am

I’ve climbed the crown and the whole statue, up and down. Yes, it was impressive.

But sorry, this is just a bad idea.

Another example of American entitlement: they want what they want when and how they want it and without any compromise or sacrifice.

And “safety” is hardly ever a compelling reason for compromise.

Sorry folks, Americans just have to get used to the word “no” from time to time. Safety first in this circumstance – what if someone has a plain old heart attack 10′ from the top? – and the good of the whole outweighs the desire of the tourist.

Please correct your story. Your story suggests that a saboteur planted a bomb in the Statute of Liberty which caused damage to the crown. The Statute of Liberty’s crown was closed after the Black Tom Island explosion in December 1916. Black Tom Island was a staging area for the shipment of American made munitions to the Allies in World War I. The force of the explosion and debris flying away from the explosion caused damage miles away, including in the Statute of Liberty. It is believed that a German saboteur caused the explosion, and Germany eventually paid war reparations as a result. .

What’s the difference between “a saboteur’s bomb” and “a terrorist attack” – the year?

This is great, and the type of positive change Obama brings. Bush closed it to remind Americans to live in fear.

MarshV – close the island and cut NPS budget? Where’s your patriotism?

God Bless Barack Obama’s sensible decision making!

It seems the Obama administration and their cult of followers can’t even resist overturning a Bush administration policy that was sensible and looked out for the best interests of the public!

But just wait until someone is seriously injured or killed because of the totally unsafe conditions on the stairway to the crown, somehow it won’t be Obama’s fault then…

Once again freedom trumps “safety.” I have fond memories of climbing into that crown and feeling like I was inside freedom’s mind. It’s breathtaking! Just another reason to love Obama!